Carl Herman

hat tip: Activist Post “Money trumps peace.”   ~ President G.W. Bush , Valentine’s Day 2007 Spiro 1 ’s sharp 6 minute analysis that President Trump’s impeachment is intentional projection of then Vice President Joe Biden’s actual quid pro quo to Ukraine’s President that he must fire the criminal prosecutor investigating now-indicted Burisma Holdings (Burisma had Joe’s son, Hunter, on its Board) in order to receive $1 billion of US taxpayer-supported aid, among other .01% crimes of the ongoing US illegal rogue state empire centered in war and what is used for money (1-page economic reform summary here ): My analysis of the so-called “impeachment” aligns with Q’s explanation that this is a desperate Hail Mary pass from .01% “leaders” who criminally manipulate and extort millions of taxpayer dollars into their own hands. For example, it was then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who approved of the US selling 20% of US uranium supply to Russia, for which involve

Can US national debt be sustained, or is it an exponential and accelerating growth curve with mechanics that must crash if not reformed?  The nominal annual interest payment of US national debt pushed over $600 billion; doubled from just 2004 . Demonocracy's 2 minute visual of the national debt: As a math teacher, I see exponential growth in a model that creates what we use for money only as negative numbers (debt/credit). Without the power to create money as positive numbers ( monetary reform explained below), this accelerating growth of debt only has one outcome: crash.  Moreover, I see insiders know this, as oligarchs push for short-term tax benefits as 91 Fortune 500 companies paid zero taxes (some received taxpayer subsidized refunds despite profits in the collective trillions, with an average tax down to 11% ). The top 1% now own more assets than the bottom 99%. This is a 1-page summary of Claremont Colleges’ published research of a paper I wrote

“As a result of the 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions we identified, relevant information was not shared with, and consequently not considered by, important Department decision makers and the court, and the FISA applications made it appear as though the evidence supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case. We also found basic, fundamental, and serious errors during the completion of the FBI's factual accuracy reviews, known as the Woods Procedures, which are designed to ensure that FISA applications contain a full and accurate presentation of the facts.”  ~ IG report : Review of Four FISA Applications and Other Aspects of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigation, page 413 (17 “significant inaccuracies and omissions” explained in Executive Summary, pages i - xix) “The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld in