Twice-daily satellite photos over Sandy Hook show 'chemtrails' only once from 2010 to 2017: on the morning of the ‘shooting' event. Those 5840 to one odds combined with 'mothers' averaging 36 years at birth to ‘victim children' = 637 sextillion to one odds that Sandy Hook was a false flag hoax

PlasmaBurns of YouTube noticed “chemtrails” in Sandy Hook pictures, looked at satellite documentation, and discovered that twice-daily photos only had such chemtrails over Sandy Hook one morning from 2010 to 2017 (5840 days): the alleged Sandy Hook shooting. 

PlasmaBurns’ sharp catch of this data in 7 minutes:

Please note at 5:29 in the video there’s a regular contrail from a jet that immediately evaporates, as opposed to the chemtrails that expand and stay. PlasmaBurns compared the chemtrails to commercial airline flights and found zero traffic where these chemtrails were sprayed from airplanes. 

This means these non-commercial airplanes had to receive government clearance to spew those chemicals over Sandy Hook that morning, and whatever government agencies were connected to that clearance are criminal accomplices with foreknowledge of the Sandy Hook event.

Importantly, because satellite imagery can detail car types and perhaps license plates, cars in the Sandy Hook parking lot can be identified to verify just who was and was not present in the years leading to the event.

Alleged mothers averaging 36 years of age giving birth to alleged victims is impossible: odds of quintillions to one

I wrote on this topic in 2014, and recently contributed that the average age giving birth of 36 for the 20 women claiming to be the victims’ mothers have probabilities against such relatively elderly mothers from 109 quintillion to one (if we embrace national data that just one in eleven mothers would be 35 or older giving birth), to an extremely unrealistic of “only” 95 trillion to one if we assume one in five Sandy Hook mothers would be 36 or older giving birth (see article and comments for analysis). Another professional with academic and professional expertise with statistical analysis concluded the odds of 20 such elderly mothers is 62, 482, 742, 574, 637, 216, 553 to one (that’s 62 quintillion to one), and it is 812 million times more likely that the alleged victims were born in 1996 rather than 2006 (the “official” story).

The above links have abundant other areas of proof.

In statistics, we can combine odds of two separate events. This can quickly get complicated, and combines art with science. In the approximation of odds of alleged mothers’ ages combined with chemtrails occurring only once during 5840 satellite photos, perhaps an easier analogy will help:

Imagine a person driving to work and home along the same route five days a week, 50 weeks a year for 11 years (to approximate 5840 chances). On only one morning after these 11 years, government officials re-route traffic, and with no apparent reason to do so. The person is redirected into a construction zone (not away), where an alleged accident of astronomical odds kills the person. For illustration, the “official story” is a combination of mechanical failure and human error: a demolition wrecking ball is placed directly over the driver while he is stopped by officials, dropped, and crushed the person.

Is there a connection between the officials ordering the traffic re-route and the troubled official explanation of an “accident”?

One would have to ask, and answer that apparently there is. In our analogy:
  • Who ordered traffic to be re-routed when there was no apparent purpose?
  • What was the purpose of the re-route?
  • The sheer improbability of the one morning among ~5500 of a usual commute being exactly the one morning of an impossible “accident” requiring violations of let’s say a dozen safety protocols must be investigated by any rational person wanting the facts.
Let’s look at our combination of chemtrails and alleged mothers’ ages:
  • Who ordered the non-commercial flights to spray what chemicals over Sandy Hook on the morning of December 14, 2012?
  • Who approved these multiple flights spraying those chemicals?
  • What was the purpose of the spraying?
  • The sheer improbability of the one morning among ~5840 of chemical spraying obscuring satellite photos providing helpful data to explain the facts of an apparently impossible “mass shooting” requiring violations of let’s say a dozen response protocols must be investigated by any rational person wanting the facts.
So what are the odds??? That’s the question of this essay, and a good one.

Perhaps we can combine these odds as the best conclusion, or perhaps not. Certainly we can conclude that the presence of chemtrails on the morning of the Sandy Hook event and none other over seven years increases the improbability that the official story is true. It also demands independent criminal investigation about these chemtrails.

The US leading expert on school safety training agrees 

Marty Leeds’ excellent 78-minute documentary of national school safety expert Wolfgang Halbig walks the audience through Mr. Halbig’s credentials (as a public school teacher I am unaware of anyone more respected for school safety), and the evidence he’s found from attempting to get the details of Sandy Hook from officials in order to best advise other school districts for student safety. I challenge skeptics to find any fault with Mr. Halbig’s rational and essential doubts from his expertise of being a school principal, teacher, law enforcement officer, and leading voice in school safety training, or with the other evidence presented:


An interview by Greg Carlwood with Mr. Halbig just last month (67 minutes), well worth the investment to hear the evidence:



Context: Could .01% US rogue state empire lying about using guns for illegal wars also be lying to take guns from Americans before we discover the truth of illegal Wars of Aggression?

After you’ve watched the above videos of perhaps the #1 national school safety expert walking you through the data, the obvious question is why government “leaders” would perpetuate this apparent hoax. To be clear, the only way a person can ethically claim “official” stories are true requires review of the strongest arguments that it was a hoax.

So before you argue, have you looked at the factual evidence?

Assuming you have, let’s address motive for a hoax. The conclusion of the authors of Nobody died at Sandy Hook (13 various experts that includes 6 current or retired professors) is gun control, as supported in their quote from Mao that dictatorial government requires unarmed subjects:
“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns; that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”

I add this: We the People are on the edge of dispelling Emperor’s New Clothes delusion to recognize US .01% naked empire. The .01% are scrambling for ongoing control of propaganda to hide rogue state empire, and proactively working to seize guns for their own protection.

May I remind you of fundamental US history: the American Revolution started when our own government enacted involuntary gun control. Our .01% wanna-be masters would certainly prefer our voluntary gun control, and would engage in ongoing deception to achieve that policy objective.

Among the facts demonstrating a .01% US rogue state:
Don’t believe such ‘Big Lies’ are possible in the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave? How about assassinating President Kennedy, then outrageously lying for over 50 years?

With full documentation here:

AlphaMindControl’s revealing 3-minute video of CIA Director Colby’s testimony to the US Senate for the 1975 Church Committee admitting the CIA directs corporate media how to lie to the American public with “fake news” (six similar videos here):


3-minute video of Dan Rather’s fake news from November 25, 1963 to sell the lie that President Kennedy’s fatal head shot caused “violent forward motion” opposite to the fact his head was violently hit to cause backward motion (hat tip What Really Happened):


Breaking history for a future brighter than we can imagine: .01% arrests for OBVIOUS crimes centered in lie-started illegal Wars of Aggression, looting, constant lying

Given the prima facie evidence, it’s unreasonable for Americans to “hope for change” from Donald Trump’s “leadership.” We the People must demand .01% arrests or continue to serve as minions and work animals to rogue state empire. Until .01% arrests prove real leadership to stop ongoing slaughter of millions of human beings, harm to billions, and looting of trillions, it is only reasonable for Americans to embrace the evidence only lightly summarized in this article to conclude ongoing illegal .01% empire under a new “teleprompter reader-in-chief,” lying psychopathic puppet, oligarchic tool on the Right hand of one vicious imperial political body.

The categories of crime include:
  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):


3-minute videoPolice, Military – Was your Oath sincere?




**
I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
**
Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: My work from 2012 to October, 2017 is on Washington’s Blog. Work back to 2009 is blocked by Examiner.com (and from other whistleblowers), so some links to those essays are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive (blocked author pages: here, here).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

45,000 sealed federal criminal indictments is victory for ‘We the People’ if, and only if, followed by .01% arrests and FULL TRUTH as explained by Congressperson McKinney’s 15-minute brief

51,701 sealed federal indictments = trust Q/Trump plan? Patriots should trust until 2018 so-called ‘elections’ for .01% arrests + FULL TRUTH, or add Trump to list of War Criminals, psychopaths, host-killing parasites

65-minute video: Professor Jim Fetzer’s legal testimony for Sandy Hook lawsuit could be bigger than King Family civil trial