65-minute video: Professor Jim Fetzer’s legal testimony for Sandy Hook lawsuit could be bigger than King Family civil trial
I consider Dr. Jim Fetzer a hero and among the “Re-Founders of America” for leading research beginning with proving President Kennedy was assassinated by our own government, and continuing to the present with game-changing documentations with experts.
Jim explains in three paragraphs from The Sandy Hook “Pozner v. Fetzer” lawsuit for dummies:
“On 27 November 2018, the Minneapolis law firm, Meshbesher and Spence, Ltd., filed a suit against me on behalf of its client, Plaintiff Leonard Pozner, for defamation… I do not want the case to be dismissed. I want to have a formal, legal resolution.
The Complaint is narrowly drawn to focus on assertions I have made–no doubt, hundreds of times–that the death certificate that Leonard Pozner gave to Kelley Watt is a fabrication, where the Complaint cites two instances in which I made that assertion, one from Ch. 11 of the book, NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2nd edition, 2016), which I edited, and one from “How We Know Sandy Hook Was A FEMA Drill, Nobody Died, for an Anti-Gun Agenda” (5 August 2018), published as a contribution to SANDY HOOK TRUTH: MEMORANDA FOR THE PRESIDENT (2018).
The Complaint (paraphrasing for simplicity) alleges that those assertions are false because the death certificate is not a fabrication or forgery or fake (all words I have used to describe it) and does not differ “in any material respect” from the death certificate certified by the State of Connecticut. It further alleges that my assertions were made in reckless disregard of the facts and intended to harm Plaintiff’s reputation and subject Plaintiff to public contempt, disgrace, ridicule or attack. By my ANSWER, I categorically reject and deny each and every one of these allegations.”
If you’re interested, here is an online version of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, edited by Jim and Mike Palecek, with chapters by thirteen experts, including six Ph.D. professors.
Army Psyop’s strong 65-minute discussion with Jim on his testimony responsive to the lawsuit (removed by YouTube on Feb. 6, 2019):
(go here for interview)
The lawsuit Jim answers and will counter might become more important than the King Family civil trial, where the comprehensive and objective evidence produced jury verdict of US government guilt for Martin’s assassination:
- US 111th Military Intelligence Group were at Dr. King’s location during the assassination.
- 20th Special Forces Group had an 8-man sniper team at the assassination location on that day.
- Usual Memphis Police special body guards were ordered they “weren’t needed” on the day of the assassination.
- Regular and constant police protection for Dr. King was removed from protecting Dr. King an hour before the assassination.
- Military Intelligence set-up photographers on the roof of a fire station with clear view to Dr. King’s balcony.
- Dr. King’s room was changed from a secure 1st-floor room to an exposed balcony room.
- Memphis police ordered cutting down bushes that would have hid a sniper from where multiple witnesses reported as the source of shooting.
- Along with sanitizing a crime scene, police abandoned investigative procedure to interview witnesses who lived by the scene of the shooting.
- The rifle Mr. Ray delivered was not matched to the bullet that killed Dr. King, and was not sighted to accurately shoot.
The evidence proving the “official” explanation of Sandy Hook is false is just as powerful as the King Family civil trial, as I hope you’ve considered from the above video.
Both subject areas are immensely important and game-changing when recognized by the American public.
For Sandy Hook, I have contributed that the “official” story of the 20 alleged mothers’ of alleged 1st grade student victims' average age giving birth of 36 makes for impossibly-old parents: odds of this being true are about 109,418,989,131,512,370,000 to 1. With more detail here, let’s spend a few paragraphs in consideration of this one detail among dozens that argue the only rational position is to challenge the “official” story:
According to the CDC, the percentage of US mothers giving their first birth at age 35 or older for 2006 is ~8%; about 1 in every 12. Pew Research Center reports that American mothers’ age 35 or older for any birth is 14%. Therefore, let’s estimate the percentage of 1st grade students’ mothers ages being 36 or older at 11%: about 1 in every 9. Age 36 is nine years above CDC average of age 27 for mothers with any number of children giving birth in 2006.
This means in an average US classroom of 27 1st grade students, 24 moms would be younger than 36, and only 3 would be 36 or older. To calculate the odds that the average age of Sandy Hook mothers at birth was 36, we multiply 1/9 to itself 20 times. This is the same method for the odds of flipping a coin: multiply 1/2 times the number of flips to have the odds of all heads or all tails (the odds of two straight heads is 1/4, 20 straight heads or tails is 1 in 1,048, 576 by placing 2 in the number to calculate, then looking at power of 20).
The odds that Sandy Hook mothers averaged an age of 36 is therefore about 109,418,989,131,512,370,000 to 1 (verify yourself by placing 9 in the calculator, then looking at the power of 20).
I had to look up how to say this number: 109 quintillion, 418 quadrillion, 989 trillion, 131 billion, 512 million, 370 thousand. Or:
one hundred nine quintillion,
four hundred eighteen quadrillion,
nine hundred eighty-nine trillion,
one hundred thirty-one billion,
five hundred twelve million,
three hundred seventy thousand
Jim’s Comprehensive Overview of the Death of JFK in two hours from 2019:
I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu
Note: My work from 2012 to October, 2017 is on Washington’s Blog. Work back to 2009 is blocked by Examiner.com (and from other whistleblowers), so some links to those essays are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive (blocked author pages: here, here).