Requesting US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, UC Berkeley and Cal State East Bay’s Political Science Chairs: either affirm or refute that ongoing US armed attacks are illegal Wars of Aggression

I wrote that I’m working with interested teachers to request our school district remove military recruitment because ongoing US armed attacks are illegal Wars of Aggression. Our group is now requesting US Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, UC Berkeley and Cal State East Bay’s Political Science Chairs to either affirm or refute this factual claim.

Following is what we sent these groups. I’ll continue updating you.

Our message:

I write as Chair of a committee for real-world solutions at Hayward HS, and published writer with ~50 million pageviews in politics and economics.

We're contacting you to request official explanation of how current US armed attacks are lawful.

We're also contacting UC Berkeley's Political Science Chair (or other expert) for either affirmation or refutation of the claim that current US armed attacks are unlawful Wars of Aggression, CSUEB's Political Science Chair, and the four major branches of US military: Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines. We will share these responses with students, parents, teachers/admin, and public, so please be proud of your response as clearly addressing war law such as "War law states (a, b, c) so the wars are legal/illegal because (d, e, f)." 

Below is a 1-page summary of this published paper.

US illegal Wars of Aggression: exercise basic education to stop military recruitment of HUSD students for ongoing War Crimes

War law is crystal-clear in letter and intent: two world wars that killed ~20 million then ~60 million ended with treaties expressly forbidding military armed attacks unless under attack by a foreign government (or imminent threat), or authorized by the UN Security Council. The two treaties requiring that limit (Kellogg-Briand and UN Charter) are taught in every high school World and US History class. The definition of a treaty under Article 6 of the US Constitution is "supreme Law of the Land," so when a US President signs with 2/3rds ratification of the Senate, US political and military leadership are Oath-bound to defend and protect the promised peace. War law is similar to limits of force for civilians walking the streets: exercise all self-defense if needed, but going to someone’s house to attack them is a crime, not “pre-emptive self-defense.”

The above summary of war law is published research by The Claremont Colleges. We scholars for peace and justice have found zero refutation of such factual claims, with teachers and public ignorant of war law.

We respectfully remind colleagues that all of us signed an Oath to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, as a condition of our employment. We request your actions in good-faith honor of this Oath, our academic professionalism to say and do something about the greatest cost connected to our constant struggle for school funding, and in ethical response for the greatest human rescue mission in Earth history under renewed threat of a third world war with nuclear weapons capable of destroying all life on Earth. 

We assert that recognizing and refusing illegal Wars of Aggression is a basic application of a high school education, and required of professional educators responsible for the education and safety of the children at our schools. Refusing our children to be recruited for ongoing War Crimes is a professional duty to prevent an obvious and known harm to our children, not an option. We hope such a basic and easy choice is clear to you. 

If you have a justification to support illegal US Wars of Aggression started with lies known to be lies as they were told (see part 2), then we’d like to hear it. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘Financial’/‘monetary’/‘derivative’ house-of-cards collapse? Remember: Superior mechanics already proven by Ben Franklin with monetary reform and public banking, backed by Thomas Edison, 86% of Economics professors

Image
In 2002, mega-investor  Warren Buffett wrote  that derivatives were “financial weapons of mass destruction.” At that time, their total “notional” value (the value of the underlying assets from which the “derivatives” were “derived”) was  estimated at $56 trillion .  Investopedia reported in May 2022  that the derivatives bubble had reached an estimated $600 trillion according to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and that the total is often estimated at over $1 quadrillion.  No one knows for sure, because  most of the trades are done privately .    ~ Ellen Brown, The Looming Quadrillion Dollar Derivatives Tsunami , 3/12/23 I’m inspired by my friend and colleague Ellen’s article, along with this excellent discussion among leading economic rebels, to comment that any “paper collapse” of gambling/fraud is good , and solutions are ready to implement now . What the derivative bubble Ellen explains and documents means relative to t...
Read more

The one article you need to prove current US wars are lie-started Wars of Aggression not even close to lawful self-defense, war-murder millions, loot trillions, and require YOUR voice for .01% arrests

Image
“It is no use trying to escape their arrogance by submission or good behavior. Robbers of the world, having by universal plunder exhausted the land, their drive is greed. If the enemy be rich, they are rapacious; if poor, they lust for domination. Neither rule of the East nor West can satisfy them. Alone among men, they crave with equal eagerness poverty and riches. To plunder, slaughter, seize with false pretenses, they give the lying name ‘empire.’ And where nothing remains but a desert, they call that ‘peace.’ ”  ~  Tacitus,  The Agricola and the Germania , on Roman Empire foreign wars in "self-defense" (analyses   here ,  here ) Overview The United States is the most dangerous illegal  rogue state empire  in human history.  The  escalating military armed attacks  under President Trump we witness in the present is a continuation of illegal  Wars of Aggression   (and here ) , the worst action a nation can tak...
Read more

Essay to ~100 teacher colleagues for “red-pill scholarship” to explain, document, & prove Evil totalitarian global scamdemic

In my ongoing challenge  (final episode here ) to my NorCal public school district to force them to either explain how their “health” “orders” are within legal limits (the district refuses; only dictating “just follow orders”), OR to downgrade “orders” to “advice,” I sent the following email to ~100 teaching colleagues on September 4.   The title’s promise is that I will explain, document, and prove an evil totalitarian global “scamdemic.” As a professional scholar, I chose each word for precision and concision. I challenge you, the reader, to invent a more accurate title after you’ve carefully read for any factual errors, both in commission and omission. And should you find the factual claims are substantiated, then please have a chat with yourself about withdrawing your consent from associated “Covid” “leaders.” This ~4,700 word essay is my best “shot” to “red-pill” colleagues with a documented paper that explains and proves the Covid-19 policies are both prima facie- illeg...
Read more