Sandy Hook Orwellian ‘show trial’ continues: defendant fined $450,000 for non-crime after non-judge dictated guilt in non-trial (no evidence, no jury). Appeal pending for either justice or martyrdom

crime: n. a violation of a law in which there is injury to the public or a member of the public and a term in jail or prison, and/or a fine as possible penalties.

defamation: n. the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation. … Public figures, including officeholders and candidates, have to show that the defamation was made with malicious intent and was not just fair comment. 

due process of law: n. a fundamental principle of fairness in all legal matters, both civil and criminal, especially in the courts. All legal procedures set by statute and court practice, including notice of rights, must be followed for each individual so that no prejudicial or unequal treatment will result. While somewhat indefinite, the term can be gauged by its aim to safeguard both private and public rights against unfairness. The universal guarantee of due process is in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which provides "No person shall…be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," and is applied to all states by the 14th Amendment.

note: My original article from July 12, 2019 was censored and removed, titled: 

Dr. Jim Fetzer's debrief on Sandy Hook ‘show trial’: Orwellian ‘judge’ violates right for jury to determine disputed facts, claims five versions of death certificate = ‘no differences,’ silences two expert witnesses proving multiple areas of forgery

**

History will record Professor Jim Fetzer as a “Re-Founder” of America for challenging the illegal rogue state empire the US devolved into. 

His leadership to explain, document, and prove that “official” explanations for major policy-leading events are false, and good-faith academic professionalism for factual discovery of what actually happened, are leading work as important as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington to expose the lies of their imperial illegal government. 

He began with proving President Kennedy was assassinated by our own government, and continues to the present with game-changing documentations. As arguably the "most dangerous mind in America," I fully recommend the online version of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, edited by Fetzer and Mike Palecek (co-defendant), with chapters by thirteen experts, including six Ph.D. professors.

Fetzer was ordered to pay $450,000 to an alleged father of an alleged Sandy Hook “shooting” victim for alleged defamation. This crime of alleged defamation was not for communication against the alleged father (defamation requires false statements about a person, not a thing, meaning that a crime did not occur) but for pointing to the obvious conclusion that five different versions of an alleged “death certificate” fully documented as containing multiple elements of fabrication by two legal experts in document forgery means that the “death certificates” were not all authentic (to say the least damning conclusion).

I documented the first phase of non-justice in this non-trial; excerpt:

“Judge Remington acted in Orwellian-opposition of his sworn duties to uphold rights of the accused to present a defense to a jury of one’s peers. Instead, he orchestrated a show trial for dictatorial government: obedience to what is dictated by “officials.” Just three of Remington’s violations:

• Fetzer is guaranteed trial by jury rather than judge. This was one of the complaints by American Founders documented in the Declaration of Independence. The purpose of a jury trial is for our peers to determine the facts and merit of law (jury nullification: an essential right) after the accused has provided a defense, and to prevent a government-appointed and/or paid official to have dictatorial control over We the People. The above cited passages of the Wisconsin Constitution are crystal-clear in letter and intent: Remington completely destroyed the constitutional rights of the defendants that he is Oath-sworn to uphold. By doing so, this so-called "judge" destroyed the definitions of court, due process, justice, and all other American freedoms to fairly settle disputes with claims of damages. This was premeditated murder of what we're all promised by the Judicial Branch of government, and must therefore be called something else: a show trial to target and silence dissent (motives for this murder documented below). 
• Judge Remington was given five different versions of the alleged death certificate, with affidavits from two experts in document forgeries concluding that Pozner’s “death certificate” is a fabrication. Their central, powerful, and damning expert testimonies are below to prove Judge Remington is sworn to provide jury trial because the facts in the case are in contention. Rather than act as fair umpire in a court of law, Judge Remington chose to conduct a show trial joining an apparent criminal conspiracy to hide evidence of what happened at Sandy Hook, then attack patriots raising questions. 
• Remington’s summary judgment LIED that the facts of the case were not in contention, despite the defendants’ declaration of the opposite backed by expert witnesses and game-changing evidence. Remington claimed dictatorial control to interpret factual evidence with the explanation that the five different versions of the alleged death certificate were not important, with zero consideration to acknowledge or address the expert witnesses’ assertions of forgery! From Jim’s account, Remington claimed: “I’ve looked at the exhibits. I follow and track all of the explanations that have been provided by the Plaintiff as to explaining the differences between the various forms and copies of the death certificates. All of that makes sense to me and provide a plausible and acceptable explanation for those differences. [P. 163, L 9-14]” Obviously, a judge’s role in a court of law is to conduct a fair contest of evidence and interpretations of facts, not to interpret the evidence and usurp the role of a jury. This choice of Remington is not innocent error or incompetence: it is deliberate choice for a show trial through intentional destruction of central components of the role of judge.

The affidavits of two professionals in document analysis (provided below) demonstrate to any prudent adult that five different versions of a public document with multiple areas of apparent alterations means at the very least that the appropriate public official should account for these different versions and how the evidence of apparent alterations came into existence. This game-changing evidence, as you can verify for yourself, is valid and therefore grounds for a jury to consider that judges are oath-bound to honor.” (excerpt end)

Fetzer is appealing the case, as he explains: 

“You will see the grounds on which I am appealing this case, where the most blatant violation of my rights occurred when the Court decided that there was no dispute about the authenticity of the death certificate, when I had the reports of two forensic document examiners to the contrary—and where, because it lacked the certification of the Town Registrar, the death certificate that I had described in the book as a “fabrication” IS a fabrication! It was “a very simple case”, which was wrongly decided.”

Fetzer also provides the basic documents of the case for public consideration, as well as analyses by independent writers.

Justice or martyrdom?!?

Yes. 

We’ll either have justice to reveal US “leaders” as rogue state criminals, or Fetzer will receive the maximum torture those leaders can apply to silence those of us revealing illegal rogue state empire crimes worse than almost all Americans are capable to imagine.

Context: illegal US rogue state empire?!?

Yes. 

See for yourself.

It’s Emperor’s New Clothes obvious for all with intellectual integrity and moral courage to simply look and see naked empire right in front of us.

Almost all Americans sense something is deeply wrong with the forever wars, accelerating national debt, and devolving “reporting” from corporate media, among ~100 areas of game-changing facts for those willing to see.

Many Americans imagine themselves as virtuous enough to have stood with Dr. King, the American Founders, or even Jesus. There’s no need to imagine that level of virtue because one can test it by where one stands today on issues such as Sandy Hook, the forever illegal US Wars of Aggression, or the King Family civil trial proving Martin was assassinated by the US government.

The contest is on between the devolved US “leaders” operating this illegal rogue state empire with massive crimes annually killing millions, harming billions, and looting trillions versus those standing for simple truth and justice for obvious facts that are objective and independently verifiable for anyone with just a high school-level of education.

The Big Lie that ‘mass shootings’ like Sandy Hook require public gun confiscation must be flipped: arrest .01% US rogue state leaders to confiscate THEIR guns for shooting millions

If you want my best shot to reveal how the public should see Sandy Hook, read this. 

**

I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: My work from 2012 to October, 2017 is on Washington’s Blog. Work back to 2009 is blocked by Examiner.com (and from other whistleblowers), so some links to those essays are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive (blocked author pages: here, here).