Challenging our public school district’s obedience of county ‘health’ ‘orders’: Attorneys engaged for lawsuit + my best ‘shot’ to ‘red pill’ ~100 teacher colleagues with game-changing data corporate media refuse to report (26 of ?)

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”  ~ George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 7

Perhaps the most helpful format for communication: 

My best “shot” to explain, document, and prove the “Covid” + “vaccine” narrative are Crimes Against Humanity: a 4,700-word essay I sent to ~100 teacher colleagues in September, 2021 (received with silence to the facts, with ~20 eventual responses to be removed from such communications). My May 2022 essay to our teachers’ union Board is an excellent overview of the entire history, as is my June 14, 2022 retirement letter; both with emerging data demonstrating tremendous harm from these experimental injections (2-hour overview discussion with Professor Emeritus Jim Fetzer).


Summary (links = full documentation in those specific reports): The California “lockdown orders” necessary to “flatten the curve and keep hospitals running” have lasted since March 3, 2020. The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. Because Californians never received comprehensive hospital data, our government and corporate media “leaders” are lying in omission. Because problematic “positive cases”(and here, here) were substituted for “beyond control” hospitals, our leaders lie in commission. All testimony I’ve received from ~20 medical professionals here in NorCal report all hospitals they know of have been fully within their control throughout the “pandemic,” that hospitals have comprehensive area plans for record flu seasons they haven’t needed, and certainly didn’t need the military field hospitals or hospital ships for a real pandemic.


As a NorCal public school teacher, at the start of our school year in September 2020 I questioned our district’s leadership and teachers’ union how their negotiated policy to “obey” county “health” “orders” is legal given the above reasonable limit to dictatorial authority. I cited our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions within their limited governing authorities. I reminded the district I merely ask them as educated professional adults to perform what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81). 


From September 2020 until May 1, 2022, I chose to mask identities of individuals involved to help shield them from any possible future harm when facts emerge to demonstrate to the public that these school administrators and teachers were either knowing participants, or dupes too weak in intellectual integrity and moral courage to recognize and defend literal Truth, Justice, and the American way of limited government under constitutionally-protected inalienable/Natural rights.  I named names after 20 months of district lies and prima faciecrimes.

 

After two Sept. 2020 requests, the district contact person responded by ignoring my questions, and stating HUSD employees are required to obey “California mandates” “to protect you” (disobedient staff are placed on unpaid leave up to a year). I emailed our district superintendent, school board members, my school principal and two interested teachers that we teach all high school students in US History class that the district’s position of “just following orders” is an illegal defense, and asked again how ESA limits are being honored.


After continued district silence, I filed three legal complaints: federal, state, and a grievance for district violation of worker safety by issuing apparent dictatorial and illegal policy under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1).


Our union (HEA) responded with support to ask the district, and communicated privately they wouldn’t pursue the grievance to arbitration because working conditions were negotiated in good faith with high approval of union members. After I probed with a few questions, I retreated with HEA to keep them as allies with me to get answers from our contractual grievance process. That said, this first Grievance finished with district and union agreement that the complaint didn’t qualify as a grievance because all district policies were in conformance to law. Neither the district nor union ever addressed my question or citation about limits of dictatorial ordering authority.


I appealed the district’s answer to our community school board for what the district redefined as a “written complaint.” From October 2 to December 18 2020 the district was silent, despite policy promising a response within 30 days of the board’s receipt. After this December 13 reminder they were out of compliance for a response, the superintendent answered that the school board upheld the district response without comment. 


I received a “non-response” after nearly 5 months from my complaint to the US Department of Justice regarding unlimited government. My complaint to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing complaint was fielded by a phone call response in December, their promise to follow-up, and silence since.


In March 2021, our NorCal public school superintendent sent all staff an email citing county deaths from COVID nearing 1,300 with 80,000 “cases.” He also asked for our professional responses to an upcoming survey. I responded with three basic questions: 

  • How many of our staff and students have died of (not with) Covid? 
  • What is the current and historical data for overall county deaths given controversy over causes of deaths? 
  • How many staff and students have been injured by vaccines?

The superintendent ignored my emailed questions twice, which I then shared with our school’s ~100 teachers as Chair of a school Professional Learning Community (PLC) on broad educational topics directly affecting our school’s teaching and learning. A few teachers have communicated support, but our Social Science Department found no interest in this topic when I emailed them in inquiry.


Our district superintendent then "answered" my questions, and concluded with: “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I responded I would do so, and report my findings. 


I followed up with 14 CA government agencies over 6 weeks, with all ignoring the question of how the limit of “beyond control” hospitals was being honored for “emergency” dictatorial authority. The only answer I received referencing limits to dictatorial orders was from CA Senator Glazer’s office, who offered that a stated 60-day limit I questioned applied only to “non-safety” related orders. I hadn’t considered an American legislature would surrender forever dictatorial powers to a governor or elected officials without a time limit, as public recourse would be limited to recall (as happened with Governor Newsom, albeit with Dominion “voting” machines, but that’s another history) or electing other legislators.


Therefore, at this point in our history, school district, teachers’ union, and CA government “answers” are at this point demonstrated as intentional lies of omission to claim they answered a question about ESA to “justify” dictatorial government while leaving out any consideration of crystal-clear letter and intent requiring that our hospitals are “beyond control.” The 14 CA government agencies claim dictatorial power to close businesses, stop social gatherings, force masking, force humans to forever remain no closer than six feet from each other, and with forever dictatorial power until legislators or governor dictate otherwise, and while lying in commission that “emergency powers” are authorized by unreliable “positive” “cases.” This power is dictated with direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1) placed at the top of every county “health” “order.”


At the end of April 2021, I wrote a lengthy and fully documented report of those 14 CA government agencies’ responses, and emailed it with a cover letter to district leadership, school board members, teachers’ union leadership, our PLC members, and school teachers. The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources immediately responded with threats of disciplinary action for unspecified violations of district policies, as did my school principal. The district never responded to my repeated requests and Grievance to cite anything I wrote to substantiate their complaints. The district has never rescinded their first of four steps for employment termination. 


Stop and appreciate the irony of public school district leadership refusing to cite factual claims while requiring it of all middle school students. Again: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).


I appealed to our teachers’ union for relief (and here, here). After 4 emails and 15 days of silence from our union President and VP, I sent this email to 14 of the Board of Directors of our teachers’ union. Our President and VP then responded for a next step “to gain clarification regarding matters within our scope and discuss next steps, if any,” followed by a Zoom meeting. Our union President raised the topic at her regular weekly meeting with the district’s Assistant Superintendent of HR on May 25, 2021. The district then emailed meclaiming my PLC report “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet failed again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests.


I responded with three employee grievances for apparent contract violations. 


On July 8, I spoke by phone with our teachers’ union president, who reported that the district would again consider my Grievances as employee complaints outside their contractual obligations, and the HR Assistant Superintendent admitted failure to address my requests for the district to document and explain their complaints.


On July 9, 2021 our teachers’ union held a Zoom conference with ~100 teachers to explain the tentative agreement for work conditions for the 2021 - ‘22 school year to obey “the most restrictive health measures” “ordered” by state, county or federal government. I asked the first public question on the call for our union to explain how the state has ordering authority given the strict limits of “beyond control” hospitals, with union president, VP, and another union board member responding they are still representing my question, but all legal information they’ve received is that there is no requirement to oppose ordering authority until proven in court. This answer is consistent with my observations that people are conditioned to be told what to do by “experts’” “orders.” 


The purpose of our mutual Oath is to safeguard inalienable/Natural rights against illegal “orders” from our own government. The United States rose as a nation because our own government issued “a long train of abuses and usurpations” in the form of illegal “orders.” Americans’ choices were to either surrender as colonial subjects under dictatorial rule benefiting Empire, or stand for what our mutual Oath “supports and defends.” Thomas Jefferson documented: 


“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”  ~ Declaration of Independence


My school district’s final answer to my three employee grievances came on July 21, 2021: 

  1. Teachers, staff, students and families will follow “health” “orders” because they are ordered. 
  2. “Health” “orders” are whatever is ordered. The district will not respond to requests for documentation of “ordering” authority, nor even acknowledge the question was asked despite legal obligation to explain how all policies are within the limits of the law.
  3. If teachers ask further questions how “health” “orders” are lawful or healthy, they will be disciplined up to termination under the “reason” that such questions “harass and/or disparage other’ political beliefs.”

On July 24 I responded to the district’s formal initiation of “disciplinary action steps” that lead to employment termination for unprofessional conduct by offering the district choice to finally cite their unsubstantiated complaints against me or withdraw the complaints and censorship, or face my attorney. On July 26, the district’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources responded in refusal to substantiate their claims of my unprofessional work; claiming “The District has provided you with the appropriate documentation that has sufficiently responded to your requests. At this time, there is no additional information that can be provided to you that has not already been provided.” Our teachers union President called me with analysis from her conversations with district leadership that the district is unwilling to look beyond their legal orders, and must be forced by court or legislative orders. 


I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. A second conversation affirmed the strength of this case from its abundant documentation, and that the network of lawyers are filing lawsuits based on their judgment of the best cases to help the most amount of people in greatest need of protection. I promised my willingness to serve as a plaintiff if this case rises in their judgment as the most promising to litigate. I’ve been updating three law firms participating in lawsuits that have included Los Angeles USD, San Diego USD, and nearby Piedmont USD. The attorneys communicate appreciation of my professionalism, that they would enjoy representing this case, and continue to encourage my documented work for truth and justice under the law.


On September 4, 2021, I reported to my ~100 teacher colleagues my best “shot” to “red pill” them about dozens of game-changing facts corporate media never report (my published research on corporate media “reporting” lies known to be false as they were told for the many variants of the Wars on Terror). This report to teachers (at “Update 3”) is my best academic work as a scholar to publicly share comprehensive and game-changing facts to explain, document, and prove illegal “health” “orders” (and here).


On Friday September 17, our district superintendent announced the school board would address mandatory student “vaccines” on Wednesday, September 22. I responded to district and teachers’ union leadership with legal notice of their prima facie-crimes to “require” experimental medical products, and initiated another employee Grievance for contract violation guaranteeing policies in conformance to law.


On Monday September 20, the district superintendent emailed my school’s Admin Team, teachers’ union president, and me to dictate the Professional Learning Committee I chair was censored because my addressing the previous school year’s doubled failure rate with “distance learning” (the most destructive decline of student learning in district history) “is not aligned with school or district goals and may not continue. Please communicate with (school principal) how you intend to use collaboration time or participate in a PLC that is focused on standards based instruction, school, or district goals.” Consistent with history, the superintendent failed to cite anything I wrote to demonstrate his factual claims.


On Wednesday September 22, the school board voted 5-0 to “mandate” full student “vaccination” for “Covid” (again, please see my essay to ~100 teachers for absolute proofs of deserved quotation marks). The public comment session for 1-minute remarks were ~15 against and ~25 for. Four parents and two employees contacted me from my public comment including invitation to do so, which began our ongoing conversations and actions. My three employee Grievances (at that point) also gave our teachers’ union an ultimatum to honor our contract that all district policies be “in conformance with law” by standing with me against the district’s illegal “mandates” that violate US Codes 21 and 18, and California Government Code 8558 (b) that “emergency orders” authority requires “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case). CDC’s latest data seemed definitive proof that California and national hospitals are well within control, just as each and every one of the ~20 local doctors, nurses, and other professionals I’ve asked have told me since March 2020.


On October 2, I sent a second email to our teachers’ union President, VP, and district Board Members arguing for their legal and Oath-sworn obligation to stand with me to force the district to explain the legality of their “health” “orders” given the above crystal-clear in letter and intent legal limits (the district’s stated position is “we just follow orders, and so will you”).


On October 17, 2021 I sent another Professional Learning Committee (PLC) report to district and union leaderships + Boards, and ~100 teacher colleagues with two central topics. First: HUSD refuses to address limits to state/county/district “health orders” regarding required student and teacher use of Emergency Use Authorized medical products (EUAs), despite :

The second topic of the October 17 PLC report is that our teachers’ union shared their position why “health orders” to “require” EUAs is lawful: the government is not kidnapping and forcibly injecting teachers. Yes, seriously; that’s their “legal” “justification”: as long as the principal isn’t tackling teachers in the hallway to forcibly inject them at will, the policy of staff forced unpaid leave respects Title 21 freedom for full choice over medical experiments. I was glad to force an answer, and didn’t pursue further as I’d still rather keep the union as a partner to force reasonable district answers.


On October 21, 2021, our teachers’ union president emailed me to declare my employee grievance void that requested the district to either cite their legal authority for EUA work requirements given the limits of three definitive laws, or to downgrade “requirements for employment” to “advice.” The “reason” given was the union claims that the district doesn’t have to cite legal authority for policy because any proofs of illegal policies “do not concern violations of the CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement)” despite the CBA stating all district policies must be “in conformance with law.” Both HEA and HUSD claim that state dictatorial “orders” are sufficient legal authority to compel obedience, and both have never addressed our mutual STATE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE for We the People to serve as a check on exactly this problem of illegal dictatorial government orders. My three subsequent communications to union President, VP, and Board were unanswered.


On October 28, 2021, HUSD responded to my last employee Grievance of policy violating California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 by unilaterally declaring it “an email request” of an “employee complaint” “against the legality of EUAs” that they then dismissed because we all must “follow orders.” I challenged that stand, as well as challenging district refusal to answer basic questions about “official” exemptions to EUAs.


On November 14, after a week of “official silence” from district and teachers’ union, I poked them again with questions, request to meet, and predictions of dire consequences to HUSD for their official silence beyond “just follow orders.” I also admonished HEA’s tragic-comic consent to CTA’s position that “option to refuse” experimental medical treatments allows employee termination without future ability of re-hire in public education. Both embrace Orwellian-violations of definitive CA and federal laws that “option to refuse” means the individual is free to accept or decline experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.” 


On November 15, our school principal sent an “URGENT” email “ordering” ~200 students to the quad: “All unvaccinated students will be sent home, all vaccinated student (sic) will return to class with a pass.” I discovered I was also “health ordered” home for 10 days, until I demanded documentation of definitions from the principal, and reminding him this ordering authority requires proof I was within 6 feet of a positive case for 15 minutes. After claiming no memory of the policy, the principal and I reviewed and proved “district error” (but 14 of my students were not provided this documentation for discovery of error, nor another teacher). Although my school principal admitted he lacked authority to “order” me into isolated segregation, he still obeyed district “orders” to segregate unvaxxed students. I immediately emailed the Assistant Superintendent of HR to explain and cite district ordering authority to segregate healthy unvaxxed students, which she has failed to provide over ~20 requests up to March 2022. This week also had our teachers’ union request to HUSD accepted for a December 1 “Level III” Grievance meeting with the superintendent to discuss district censorship of my PLC and taking the first step to terminate my employment due to district claims of complaints HUSD refuse to cite. HUSD continued their 6th week of failure to provide me legal definitions of the medical/religious exemption process, but agreed to meet for discussion on Dec. 3. Both of these meetings would be attended by our teachers’ union President and me. 


Ten students voiced interest in a “Truth Club,” and submitted paperwork to our Associated Student Body (ASB) with me as their club sponsor to address “the pandemic” and other game-changing areas of truth (here, here, here). On December 1 and 3 I had Zoom meetings with district leadership and our teachers’ union President regarding the previous paragraph topics. 


On December 3rd, my principal sent another “friendly reminder” for weekly Covid testing required for my continued employment. For the second time, he mistakenly revealed all email recipients who are not vaccinated. I responded with another “reply to all” to challenge my principal to explain how the “health orders” he signs are legal given federal Title 21 requirements for optional experimental medical products without coercion, or to join those of us asking questions about how these “orders” are anything other than Orwellian-illegal. The principal chose silence as his response.


For the week of December 6, I followed-up with our school principal’s silence to our questions, and my briefed classroom students requested a Zoom meeting with the district to receive answers. Students were especially motivated to receive an explanation how the district can violate “required” health “guidance” by “ordering” healthy unvaccinated students to “separate but equal” 10 days’ “medical segregation” without evidence of “exposure” to a “positive” “tested” student by being within 6 feet for 15 minutes or more. They understood I was allowed to stay on campus because HUSD has zero evidence of exposure within 6 feet for 15 minutes, but students are not allowed the same freedom for an equal education.


On Friday December 10, I received the district’s reply to our Dec. 3 meeting: the district claimed that their policy requiring employee use of EUAs or being put on unpaid leave was a “broader right” of Title 21’s right of full and fail choice to accept or decline EUAs without coercion. I responded in detail with request for another meeting for HUSD to explain their Orwellian-inversion of simple terms to claim “broader rights” include forced student segregation and forced employee unpaid leave.


On December 14, I invited the district to surrender if they wanted to avoid an upcoming meeting with ~50 students with pointed questions. HUSD announced the following day they wouldn’t enforce student “vaccine requirements.” Because of the district’s refusal to address my questions in their December 10 response, I escalated those questions into Employee Grievances and/or District Complaints. On Dec. 18, I updated ~100 teacher colleagues on breaking events.


Also on December 14, the district superintendent officially responded to placing my PLC on two months of censorship under threat of my employment termination if I continued reporting to teachers in “unprofessional conduct” they claimed since April, but repeatedly refused to cite from anything I wrote, said, or did. They withdrew the censorship under claim that the “initial” censorship was valid due to “district confusion” that my addressing a doubled student failure rate was not “focused on standards based instruction, and/or school goals, and/or district goals.” HUSD made this claim despite the PLC report in question stating in the first paragraph that the purpose of the report is to address our doubled student failure rate (btw: the reading level in the paragraph averaged at the 10th Grade level among 5 tests). HUSD claimed they needed “clarification,” and chose censorship rather than asking clarifying questions citing any concern. HUSD also chose silence over my two months of questioning to cite their concerns and alleged policy violations, including silence to two levels of my employee Grievance. My “clarification” was sufficient to remove district censorship, but not sufficient to remove district threat of my employment termination. 


After the Winter Break on January 4, 2022, our principal reported another claimed “positive” “case” of “Covid,” and “health” “ordered” 18 of my students into “separate but equal” medical segregation for 10 days of “isolated-public education.” Two students asked for my help to stand for their rights that HUSD has zero evidence they had “close contact” within 6 feet for 15 minutes to the “positive” student, as the district claimed was the rule for unvaxxed students. My question to the principal how this is legal was responded that my question was a “negative connotation” and refused to answer with promise of no further response (Update 1).


On Thursday Jan. 6 at 6:30 AM, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD and our teachers’ union of the facts, then one of the students and I met with the principal and assistant principal before school. The student, an 11th Grade female with spark and courage, further met with the APafter I left to teach classes, with the AP calling a school nurse then an assistant superintendent for help answering the question he couldn’t answer. Nobody had an answer of the district’s authority to QU-segregate students without proof of close contact. That assistant superintendent met the following morning with that student and a second segregated student (11th Grade male with quiet intelligence and strength). Both students reported that the Assistant Superintendent spent an hour trying to talk them out of their questions, claimed the district was acting “out of abundance of caution” (a talking point our principal also used). When the students insisted on answers, this assistant superintendent promised to call the county health department to ask “what to do about these two students.” Despite having no evidence of ordering authority, she maintained the district’s “health” “order” for their isolated segregation with the prima facie-illegal claim of “separate but equal” public education. 


The assistant superintendent reneged on her promise to respond no later than Monday Jan. 10 (Update 1), and ignored my three emails requesting she state who she spoke with at the county public health department, what documents were referenced, and what was discussed. Because the assistant superintendent chose silence to these reasonable requests to fulfill her promise to two of my students, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD, our teachers’ union, and our high school’s teachers on Jan. 11, and again on Jan. 12 upon no district response (minus ~12 teachers requesting exclusion). My sharing documentation of an Assistant Superintendent’s lies to two students provoked my school principal into ad hominem attack (Update 4); stating my support of two segregated healthy students were “attacks,” “trying to indoctrinate students into his way of thinking,” and “is by far the lowest I have ever seen any "educator" sink in my 16 years in the profession.” The principal defamed my professional questions on school policies as “lengthy diatribes” “I refuse to respond (to),” then gave instructions to all my teacher colleagues how to block all emails from me on any subject. I find it difficult to imagine a more unprofessional response from a school principal to a teacher’s reasonable and cited questions on district policy.


The week of Jan. 10 to 14 was distance learning via computer because the district sent home too many healthy unvaxxed staff to keep the schools open. HUSD would later that month only send home unvaxxed students “in the same indoor space” as a “positive” “test,” but not staff: another prima facie-illegal policy with motive to not close the school and no apparent “health” concern.


On January 12, I emailed to my broadest audience the documentation of the assistant superintendent ignoring my emails requesting a report how school segregation is legal that she promised my two students, given nobody at the district can explain. The only response we received from that assistant superintendent was to our first standing student who emailed the assistant superintendent requesting a report. Her “answer:” “I do not have an update on how to prove the distance before quarantining.” Please note that this non-answer does not fulfill her promise to report on what she discovered by calling the county public health department, and is similar to a student missing a promised and due report on public policy, and when asked about it after two days being late, the student answers, “I do not have an update.” 


This is a good time to mention that the California Teachers’ Association (CTA) ignored my second request for explanation how state and federal laws for optional experimental medical products can be violated by “health” “orders” (Oct. 20 and Dec. 30). I wonder why (Update 2). 


On Jan. 14, I emailed HUSD + HEA leaderships and our school’s willing teachers that two Assistant Superintendents have refused to document and explain how student segregation to isolated “separate but equal” public education is legal. I also withdrew my consent, in what I consider an excellent public essay. 


On Jan. 18, the district emailed to all staff and community members an “updated” policy to segregate unvaxxed students and staff if they were “in the same indoor space” as somebody “testing” “positive.” My response to district and union leaderships + boards included my promise for student and community complaints if I did not receive reasonable evidence authorizing “in the same indoor space.” HUSD chose silence as their response. By Friday I had 26 of my healthy unvaxxed students “health” “ordered” to isolated segregation from this “same indoor space” invented phrase, but HUSD chose not to enforce this on staff. HUSD “picking and choosing” some arbitrary “health orders” to enforce and not other arbitrary “health orders” proves a hidden political agenda (political=policy=“what is done”) to manipulate our school community, and certainly not a commitment to “health.”


On January 17, I reported to my broadest HUSD email audience that the district’s “requirement” for masks outdoors is also apparently a contrived “order” outside their authority (CDPH + CDC state “optional”), and I raise the question of HUSD fraud. On Jan. 19, our school principal emailed all staff our monthly meeting notes from Curriculum Council. Among the notes: “Share with Departments. Was emailed to all parents and students. Wear masks inside and outside at all times.” I responded to all that requiring masks outdoors is outside CDPH and CDC guidance, so therefore the policy is in apparent error. The principal replied to all with choice to ignore the facts, and defame my response as both unprofessional and unworthy of serious reply: “Aren’t you supposed to be teaching right now”? This disrespect opened the door for other staff to attack: I responded to ad hominem replies and demands for my censorship over the next ten hours. The principal never addressed the policy question, nor the unprofessional ad hominem he began in a remarkable email chain from professional educators “dedicated to factual mastery.” I conclude this to be among the most powerful evidence against the district, and for asking obviously important questions if I seek justice in a courtroom. This also validates my ongoing observation that ~98% of people cannot rise above “official” propaganda even when facts are clearly and professionally documented. I received my relative “Socrates verdict” :)


I engaged with our Social Science Department teachers (5 of 9 opted out) regarding these policies apparently outside legal limits. I offered our two hero students instructions how to file an official district complaint. I started calling the HR Assistant Superintendent during class time on speakerphone to get answers to our questions, emailed those questions to the Health Director and her, and promised to call with my classes until we got answers (we got no answers to messages we left). 


On Jan. 22 I emailed leaderships of district, teachers’ union, and school admin (not boards) repeating documentation, questions, and promise to shine brighter light on the questions. Upon no response, on Jan. 23 I filed two more Grievances for apparently illegal policies on masks and student segregation, and promised to share the Grievances with teachers inviting their filing. I also promised to assist my 26 returning students from segregated “separate but equal” education to file complaints. On Jan. 23, the Superintendent promised a “response” the following day. On Jan. 24, I received notice from the HR Assistant Superintendent to not report to work on Jan. 25 (the first of 3 days of all-school final exams for the first semester, forcing me to cancel final exams for all my students) in order to be on a 9AM Zoom call that informed me I was placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” my January 17 email (Update 1). 


On Jan. 24 (Update 4) I received another notification from my principal that I was: “a potential close contact with a positive case in your class.  Students that are fully vaccinated can stay in school if they are not showing any symptoms. Please let us know if you have any questions, and take care.” I responded with questions how the district can order unvaxxed students home but not staff, and where in any authoritative document HUSD is empowered for their “in the same indoor space” “health” “order.” The principal did not respond, of course.


Paid administrative leave is censorship to remove my capacity to communicate with colleagues, and to stop my participation asking questions and citing apparent inconsistencies of HUSD “health” “orders” to limits of law. This censorship is because any answer HUSD has so far provided is further demonstration their “orders” are outside the law. HUSD will extend their “investigation” about how and why I asked questions (rather than answer obvious and essential questions) until the end of the school year, I predict.


On Monday Feb. 7, I Zoom-met my CTA/HEA-appointed attorney to discuss my case from a perspective to “play defense” against any likely district allegation. I framed the case as district evasion from questions that prove illegal “health” “orders” that anyone can verify by comparing “orders” to limits of definitive laws. I also requested a professional analysis of suing the district for per se defamation and any other related protections/remedies for my professional reputation, freedoms from ongoing harassment, and coercion into retirement to avoid further abuses.


On Feb. 9, 2022, the HR Assistant Superintendent managing my paid administrative leave claimed my 5 active Grievances against the district were “in abeyance” because “contractual issues to be resolved would fall within regular work duties.” She did not respond to my request to cite district authority to destroy due process with Grievances, despite my citations of all applicable contract language I could find and imagine that both gave no such authority, and reminded all of ongoing due process rights. Moreover, in reading that section of our CBA, I discovered HR has one contractual duty to me: an “updated progress report every five work days until resolution” that the district was ignoring. I responded sharply, including my union-appointed attorney, and union President + VP + CTA liaison. HR also continued silence to my repeated requests to schedule a Zoom meeting for the district’s answers to essential questions HUSD promised to answer; some questions going back to early October 2020.


On Feb. 17 after continued district silence, I offered the district’s HR Assistant Superintendent whistle-blower status by joining our side (she did not respond). On Feb. 21, I filed a 6th active employee Grievance for the district violating seven contractual rights regarding my being placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I’m asking questions (rather than answer them). My teachers’ union/CTA claimed that despite zero contractual language in support, my rights for Grievance due process are “in abeyance” “because” that “is the practice when folks are on leave.” I appealed to the CTA-appointed attorney, who promised a progress report on what the district is actually “investigating” about me, Grievances, and the possibility of a lawsuit against HUSD for their apparent harassment and defamation.


From Episode 48 on February 24 until March 10’s Episode 49, HUSD reported to me that they have nothing to report after at least 7 weeks of “investigation” (no surprise, as my union-appointed attorney and I are in agreement that the district can, and will, extend their “investigation” until the end of the school year to evade my questions and stop my reports to HHS staff). My attorney made a new and unique claim to district “legitimate” ordering authority on March 9 that Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations section 3205(c)(9)(E) allows employer discretion for “greater protections” and therefore allows an employer to create “health” “orders” outside any guidelines. I retorted in detail such a new “answer” after 18 months of asking HUSD + all 14 of the most authoritative CA government agencies is, on its face, bullshit after-the-fact desperation, and requested answers to pointed questions. On March 3, HEA’s President agreed to take my Grievances “out of abeyance” and join my request that the Superintendent and HR Assistant Superintendent answer all my questions! I accepted, and followed-up on March 10 to check status of this intriguing promise.


On March 25, 2022 I had a Zoom call with HUSD’s Superintendent, HR Assistant Superintendent, our teachers’ union President, and our local CTA representative to address 5 employee Grievances HUSD had ignored, then claimed are “in abeyance” after they forced me on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I asked questions. The superintendent claimed all district “health” “orders” are lawful because they grant “broader rights,” and that is the answer to all my questions. He refused to answer my follow-up “How is forcing me on unpaid leave for declining experimental medical products a ‘broader right’ to my Title 21 right to freely decline experimental medical products” because he claimed that is a question for the employee complaint process. The superintendent did promise to answer all questions through that process. After I read the procedures for complaints, my response back to the district is they’ve already violated that process with their choice to ignore my multiple requests for answers because they are required by law to meet with me to address my concerns. I again offered HUSD the opportunity to surrender by forcing these questions upon county and/or state rather than answer them, then to withdraw obedience if we receive no answers, or Orwellian doublespeak such as forced unpaid leave is a “broader right” for employees. The district is required to respond in writing as to their positions by Friday April 8, 2022, which includes another Grievance that I’m required by contract to not discuss until decided. I followed-up again to include another Assistant Superintendent managing the complaint process to request that the district acknowledge they’ve violated my rights, then meet with me to finally answer all my questions regarding “health” “orders” in apparent violations of multiple and superior laws.


On April 1, HUSD’s HR Assistant Superintendent sent me an email claiming to answer a question I verbally asked at our March 25th Zoom meeting, then claimed, “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information.  Please consider this the final response to this matter.” As you’ve predicted, this public school district allegedly committed to uphold the highest academic professional standards:

  • Invented a straw-man question I didn’t ask.
  • Ignored my submitted written questions, some going back to September, 2020 with repeated requests for answers ~20+ times.
  • “Answered” their own lie-created straw-man question, claimed they responded to my question, and asked me to shut-up: “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information.  Please consider this the final response to this matter.”

After my response to this lying Assistant Superintendent, I asked our teachers’ union president and CTA representative, “I'm curious: is HUSD usually this evil, unprofessional to repeatedly IGNORE written questions they are legally obligated to answer honestly, and soul-suckingly addicted to lying, OR is this unusual behavior for them?”


HUSD reneged on their timeline to respond to my four Grievances (I dropped one Grievance that HUSD began performing by reporting they had no updates to report upon), and responded late on April 18. By contract, I cannot report on those Grievances’ statuses until they are decided (amended on June 14, 2022 with HUSD’s decision to reject them all). I can report that the district claims my Complaints (distinct from Grievances) have all already been addressed because the Superintendent has repeatedly dictated to employees, students, and community that we must follow orders from the state. I used the superintendent’s reply to request the Assistant Superintendent managing due process of complaints, and the Complaint Manager, to join me in my questions receiving ethical answers beyond “just follow orders.” I sent these two further communication reminding that two students have been lied to since January 10 to receive an explanation with documentation how unvaxxed students could be segregated to “separate but equal” isolated “education” without evidence of their exposure to Covid through a “close contact” (within 6 feet for 15 minutes of a “positive” “test”).


Two days later, on Friday April 22, the superintendent emailed me to claim he is “the district.” This appears as an attempt to stop the Assistant Superintendent over Complaints and the Complaint Manager from exercising our mutual Oath to support and defend limited government under Constitutional laws by comparing his non-answers to my actual questions (Update 1) for any violations of Complaint due process and laws. I responded that he speaks for his office only, and that the purpose of our Oath is for anyone and all of us to review “orders” for obvious violations of law. 


On April 25, I explicitly claimed whistleblower status to the Assistant Superintendent over Complaints and the Complaint Manager, and bcc’d the 11 parents and staff who had previously contacted me expressing support (Update 1, with one parent replying that she, too, had her Complaint ignored).  I followed with two more emails and three phone messages that these two minions all refused response, despite these follow-up emails quoting Board policy requiring HUSD to educate students and staff on health policies (not obfuscate and lie to students/staff by refusing to answer direct questions), and that HUSD continues to refuse to provide the information they received from the state for medical and religious exemptions to experimental medical products. On April 29 (Update 2), I emailed HUSD Board members with final legal notice that their employee superintendent and managed administrators refuse to honor due process of Complaints, and are covering-up apparent illegal “health” “orders.” At this point I no longer mask their identities, as they should be fully accountable to the public after 20 months of documented lies. I consider this an excellent essay to explain and document the core of HUSD’s two-part Orwellian “argument” to employees, students, and community: “Just follow orders,” and consequences for disobedience are “broader rights” granted by the district to those receiving the consequences. 


On May 5, 2022 my teachers’ union Board responded they are unlikely to support my Grievances to arbitration. I sent them the summary of indefensible district lies, crimes, and cover-ups, with questions of justice the union must accept (or be exposed as evil collaborators injecting children with poisonous “experiments”). We’ll meet via Zoom on May 17th. Our contract states that I’m to keep “all proceeding private,” but because I’m a whistleblower pointing out OBVIOUS crimes of proven deadly consequences who has been denied due process from the other parties in the contract, I must go to the public for any hope of justice. I assert legality from honoring the mutual Oath among HUSD, HEA, and me to support and defend limited government under our CA and US Constitutions. The USA and California are defined by our Constitutions, so without those limits coming first and foremost, our Oath has no meaning. Therefore, any conflict between our CBA and Oath must place our Constitutions superior to any CBA provision that would subvert them. Because I’ve abundantly demonstrated the prima facie-illegality of “health” “orders,” I am empowered by our Oath to take all reasonable actions to require official written explanations how such prima facie-illegal “health” “orders” are within the limits of law.


On May 22, I had yet to receive a decision from our teachers’ union Board, so I sent another email for clarifying choice that they must either stand for truth against OBVIOUS CTA and district lies, or bond with liars committing prima facie Crimes Against Humanity targeting children.


On May 26, HEA’s President emailed me to decline arbitration for all Grievances. This local teachers’ union, in communication with the state teachers’ union (CTA) therefore: 

  • Condone proven INVENTED “health” “orders” from districts that cannot be challenged, 
  • Allow school districts to ignore OBVIOUS questions from teachers, families, and students,
  • Support district proven lies to “order” student and teacher segregation (if unvaxxed) despite inventing the “orders” to do so,
  • Support school districts to refuse providing anyone with information about medical and religious exemptions to forced medical experiments on staff and children.

On June 14, 2022 I filed for retirement with request of settlement from HUSD for $500,000 as compensation for ending my career early, and for an openly hostile and harassing work environment. The email I sent to HUSD is an excellent summary of the two full school years of challenging my public school district’s prima facie-illegal “health” “orders” as an award-winning, and now retired, teacher.


On June 15, one of our involved HUSD parents “replied to all” with my April “Final legal notice” email to HUSD leadership to show everyone my 36-minute interview with The Healthy American leader, Peggy Hall (below). HR Assistant Superintendent Watts refused to answer my three requests to retrieve my personal belongings in my classroom after 38 years’ teaching, and after I reported this to our teachers’ union President and HHS Principal Seymour, she dictated “permission” for me to return to campus for one 99 degree late morning and afternoon (the hottest day in Hayward for the last two years). 


After a month of reflection, my observations:

  • HUSD, CA, and CTA “leaders” are script-readers following orders of a covert power source because their scripts are aligned, all refuse to answer the most BASIC and REQUIRED questions, obfuscate in tragic-comedy, and engage in Orwellian lies when they “answer” instead of evade questions (my conclusions about this “covert power structure”).
  • My teacher colleagues lack the intellectual integrity and/or moral courage to stand for BASIC and REQUIRED facts when they are:
    • “Ordered” to accept most of our students’ families are “non-essential” workers. 
    • “Required” to be shot with unlimited “medical experiments” or be segregated off campus despite their Title 21 freedom to freely decline.
    • “Mandated” to wear masks indoors and outdoors (masks = another “medical experiment” with zero “official” data for outdoor use).
    • Dictated to embrace school segregation for unvaxxed students and staff (despite zero “official” authority or “orders” to do so).
  • My teacher colleagues’ “taking a knee” to “Covid” “orders” is continued demonstration of their inability to respond to:
  • Government (so-called “public”) schools are necessary public propaganda for ongoing US rogue state empire. I wrote a 2016 12-part article series titled US Public Education: Bullshit to train stupefied work animals to explain, document, and prove this extraordinary factual assertion (and here, here). 
  • ~98% of the general population are defeated by “official” propaganda, so my teacher colleague responses are typical.
  • Because our “leaders” are propagandists pushing for dictatorial control, and professional educators are incapable of resistance, humanity needs “friends in high places” for an option beyond work animals for psychopaths. My 9-part article series on American Revolution 2.0 at the end of this current events report is my overview that we have such assistance if we work to earn it.

36-minute interview with The Healthy American, Peggy Hall:




**



Update 1: I have a scheduled call this Tuesday with my attorney. She promised to network with her legal colleagues on the front lines about the next steps to initiate legal action against my school district. The main topic of the lawsuit I can discern as a non-lawyer is apparent illegal district “health” “orders” under threat of employee termination and support of county threats of $1,000 fines per violation and a year ripped from your family and work in jail, along with apparent per se defamation. These prima facie-illegal “orders” are in direct contradiction of “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency powers that the district refuses to address other than to direct me to “just follow orders” (see below email for citations of factual claims). The school district has also refused to address our mutual Oath to uphold limited government under the CA and US Constitutions. The district has maintained this position for a year, and even after 3 employee Grievances, appeal to our school board, and supplementation of the 14 most authoritative CA government agencies also refusing to address the limits of law and mutual Oath to support and defend our Constitutions.


**


Update 2: I put the school district on legal notice to stop censorship and threats to terminate my employment. This is the email I sent to the district’s Assistant Superintendent of HR:


Aug 29, 2021, 4:09 PM


Dear (name omitted) (and colleagues with HEA, HHS Admin, and HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC),


In my previous HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC sharing with HHS teachers, (Assistant Superintendent name omitted) initiated the first step of progressive disciplinary action against me, claiming my PLC report featuring HUSD and the most authoritative 14 CA government agencies’ failure to cite and explain how “health orders” were within clear legal limits (other than direction to “just follow orders”) was “harmful or inappropriate matter” that “could be construed as harassment or disparagement of others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, or political beliefs.” 


HUSD then chose to refuse to cite what I wrote to explain and substantiate claims against my professionalism.


Therefore, I present a proposed HHH Solutions and Beyond! PLC sharing with HHS teachers dependent upon your approval. I give five business days to respond, or I will assume you find no contractual or other binding policy violation(s), and resume usual PLC sharing among interested teachers. If you find violations, cite them. Please note that reasonable people could interpret a lack of citation as an employer’s choice of ongoing harassment and per se defamation. If you refuse to cite HUSD’s complaints, please tell me the consequence should I send the PLC report anyway.


I place HUSD on notice that our mutual Constitutional Oath applies to all HUSD employees to ask OBVIOUS questions when “health order” authority is not explained or documented, and we’re inexcusably told the prima facie-illegal “just follow orders” or be fired and subject to $1,000 fines plus a year imprisonment.


As a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, US History, and Economics, and with 18 years’ lobbying experience, I admonish that HUSD’s position of ordering authority is absolutely refuted by crystal-clear limits to emergency ordering authority of “beyond control” hospitals and NOT problematic “positive cases” (and here, here). I admonish HUSD that the “reasonable person” standard of law can find HUSD guilty of criminal and civil violations given the clear explanation and documentation I’ve provided HUSD for a year. 


HUSD leadership (as well as many political leaders) may be at further risk under Federal Article 18 Section 242: DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW:


TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


HUSD can avoid all this potential legal danger, and honor our mutual Oath by joining my question, rather than ignoring it while defaming my professionalism and initiating formal disciplinary actions threatening to terminate my employment for asking questions we teach all our high school students to ask.


(I then followed with the email you’ll read next)


Update 3: My email to ~100 teaching colleagues with game-changing “Covid” facts. I’m proud of my synthesis of Patriot colleagues’ linked data and analyses. Feel free to steal or share if you find our synergistic work valuable (~4,700 words).  :)


“For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.”  ~ General George Washington, Address to the officers of the Army, March 15, 1783 (Newburg Address) 


“I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”  ~ Thomas Jefferson, Sept. 23, 1800 (letter to Benjamin Rush, and chiseled as the most prominent quote within the Jefferson Memorial dome in Washington, DC)


Dear Colleagues,

HHH Solutions and Beyond! PLC addresses the broadest education issues with direct impact on HHS teaching and learning. 


Last school year produced the worst decline in student productivity in likely district history, including doubled failure rates here at HHS. This PLC communication addresses this local HHS teaching and learning decline by considering how our mutual Constitutional Oath applies to question “health order” authority of the past distance-learning correlate to HHS doubled fail rates, and unknown outcomes for this school year dependent on future similar “health orders.”  


Important to our consideration, HUSD and the 14 most authoritative California government agencies all refuse to explain or document their authority other than say “just follow orders.” All HHS teachers received the full report of HUSD and CA government agencies’ responses in the last HHS Solutions PLC sharing of April, 2021. If you’d like me to resend or are new to HHS, please ask.


As always, if you’d prefer not to receive PLC emails from this committee, I’ll remove you at your request.


Our mutual Oath to limited government under our Constitutions


As California public school employees, we all take this Oath upon employment:


“I, (insert your name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.”


Our Constitutions are the limits of government authority. Laws then further limit ordering authority. In our immediate consideration, when Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, he did so under the limit in California Government Code 8558 (b) of “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case), or an imminent likelihood that hospitals’ patient numbers would be beyond their control. When “beyond control” hospitals never materialized, and without argument/evidence of further imminent threat, Government ordering authority is no longer authorized. Importantly, problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) do not equal “beyond control” hospitals.


Therefore, our Oath seems to empower (perhaps require) all of us employed by HUSD to at least ask for explanation and documentation how county and state “health” “orders” are lawful given their violations to our Constitutional Rights, and under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1), as Alameda County Health Orders warn the public after the title of each “order.” 


These threats extend to our students and families for permanent removal from HUSD, along with threats of fines and being locked in cages for a year.


What happened when I asked HUSD to explain their ‘ordering’ authority + invitation to join me


Again, HUSD refused to explain and document the source of “ordering” authority given the limit of “beyond control” hospitals that is crystal-clear in letter and intent to prevent ongoing dictatorial government by governor and/or legislature. HUSD refused to do what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81). HUSD refused through all three levels of employee Grievance and my appeal to the school board last year, and refused to revisit upon receiving my ~35-page documentation of six weeks’ work to contact the most authoritative 14 CA government agencies. When I (Herman) shared that report in April 2021 with HHS teachers to empower their voices and choices with the defining policies directly doubling our student fail rates and subsequent harm to graduation rates, HUSD initiated disciplinary action against me and censorship claiming the report was “harmful or inappropriate matter” that “could be construed as harassment or disparagement of others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, or political beliefs.” HUSD then refused to cite what I wrote to explain and substantiate their complaint.


HUSD has not responded to the fact that we teach all California students that “just follow orders” is an illegal defense and in prima facie violation of our mutual Oath to limit government orders under Constitutional laws that can always be cited and clearly explained. Explaining a law is as clear and simple as explaining a classroom or school rule to students, a sports rule, or a law while driving. 


The prima facie facts explained and documented in this brief communication is sufficient evidence for all of us to exercise our Oath to request a clear and written explanation how ordering authority is under the limit of “beyond control” local hospitals to enable emergency dictatorial ordering authority.


If you would like to join my voice to renew request to the district of how their “health orders” are lawful, would like further information, or have an explanation to share of how our district and HHS health policies are within legal limits, please respond to me. I am in conversations with attorneys.


I shared this communication with HUSD Assistant Superintendent (name omitted) (who initiated the first of four disciplinary steps against me leading to my employment termination), HEA leadership, HHS Admin, our PLC participants, and my attorneys, asking (name omitted) to cite any perceived contractual or other binding policy violations. I gave her five business days to respond, or I would resume usual PLC sharing among interested teachers. She did not respond.


CDC admits PCR test can’t distinguish between Covid and ordinary flu: PCR test was made with generic flu stock because CDC have not isolated any Covid sample (neither have WHO + 90 other leading health/science institutions)


“With PCR if you do it well (increased test cycles) you can find almost anything in anybody.”  ~ Kary Mullis, Ph.D, inventor of PCR, Nobel Laureate for Chemistry (more here, here, here, here)

   

 “Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, and he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing.”  ~ Kary Mullis, Ph.D, inventor of PCR, Nobel Laureate for Chemistry


In April 2020, The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted two of their labs manufactured Covid-19 tests contaminated with the exact virus being tested, producing 100% false-positives and perhaps deliberate infection. In July 2020, Tanzanian President John Magufuli (Ph.D in chemistry) gave a speech to the nation reporting the World Health Organization (WHO) returned Covid-19 positive “tests” for a papaya, motor oil, a quail, and a goat (Magufuli died along with three other heads of state challenging WHO’s Covid-19 “testing;” all within 3 months and aged 52-61). 


In July 2021, CDC withdrew a Polymerase Chair Reaction (PCR) test because it cannot “facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.” This was the 6th revision (page 52) of “test” instructions that have produced up to 90%+ false-positives.


The CDC also admitted the PCR test was designed without Covid-19 material because Covid-19 samples do not exist (expert analysis with Dr. Jane Ruby here). CDC created the PCR test from known generic flu stock (page 40):


    “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”


CDC subsequently responded to Freedom of Information Act requests that CDC has no records of an isolated and purified sample of the Covid-19 virus, thereby demonstrating CDC has no record for the existence of Covid-19 outside of unsubstantiated testimony. In fact, CDC has admitted they have no documentation of an isolated sample of Covid-19 on multiple occasions, as have WHO and almost 100 other leading international health and/or science institutes (19-minutes of expert testimony explaining how the factual claims for the measurable existence of Covid-19 are obviously and observably false, completely contrary to accepted science, and that is why the isolated samples do not exist [and more expert lab analysis]).


This admittance of no official existence of Covid-19 occurs as Alberta Canada ended all Covid “health orders” restricting personal freedoms just after an Alberta court case factual discovery disclosed that Alberta health authorities also could not provide any evidence that Covid-19 existed in any scientifically-measurable way, but only in political speech (and here, here). Gemma O’Doherty, an investigative journalist in Ireland, reports the Irish government also cannot provide any evidence for the existence of a Covid-19 sample (19-minutes of expert testimony explaining how the factual claims for the measurable existence of Covid-19 are obviously and observably false, completely contrary to accepted science, and that is why the isolated samples do not exist).


PCR ‘tests’ for ‘Covid’ reduced US flu cases by 99%???


US flu cases were reduced ~99% (and here, here) since Covid-19 “testing.” 


This seems to be consistent with a wide-scale test for “Covid” designed with generic flu stock that cannot tell the difference between “Covid” and flu.


‘Covid’ ‘certified’ deaths = anyone ‘tested’ with ‘Covid’ regardless of co-morbidities or primary causes???


   “If you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live, and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. It means technically even if you died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who's listed as a COVID death doesn't mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of the death.” ~ Dr. Ngozi Ezike, MD, Director, Illinois Department of Public Health (and here)


The CDC documented in “Certifying deaths due to Covid-19” (page 2):


    “In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.””


If we connect the above CDC’s instructions literally titled Certifying deaths due to Covid-19 with the above quote from the Director of Illinois Department of Public Health Dr. Ngozi Ezike stating official policy to conflate “dying with a positive Covid-19 ‘test’ result” and “dying from Covid-19,” We the People have reasonable doubt for actionable information from official sources. Conversely, Americans would have to be naive and/or gullible to believe such declared “experts” given the totality of official disinformation and propaganda just partially documented in this brief communication.


In context: Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, and of Harvard's Medical School: “The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion) [in 2002]. Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself.”


Important data points:


Surge of ‘breakthrough’ cases + vaccine-related deaths NOT COUNTED unless after 14 days still = ~14,000 US deaths + ~84,000 serious injuries (~20,000 dead Europeans)


HUSD has “ordered” staff injections or weekly testing. New York City public school employees must be injected by September 27, 2021 to retain employment (they previously had HUSD’s policy or either injection or testing, with San Francisco threatening to terminate all police and fire personnel refusing mandatory injections). 


Important data points on this topic:


Vaccine safety studies never submitted since 1986 requirement; $4 billion paid for American vaccine injuries by our taxes


  • The US Department of Health and Human Services has failed to perform their required safety reports of vaccines for 35 years. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act gave vaccine manufacturers legal immunity from lawsuit in exchange for biennial reports through HHS to Congress. US taxpayers would absorb vaccine injury costs, currently over $4 billion.
  • Connected to required safety procedures, Pfizer and Moderna destroyed experimental protocol by removing the human control groups for their Covid vaccines by promoting their products, then injecting almost all test subjects.
  • Therefore, vaccine manufacturers have failed to submit legally required safety reports to HHS, with HHS failing to report to Congress, with Congress and corporate media failing to report to the American public.


Masks for students refuted by NIH + at least 31 studies



Hypocritical maskless ‘leaders’ + unprecedented global public protests


You’re all probably aware of the hypocrisy of many government leaders “mandating” public masking while being caught on film violating their own mask policies (a dozen examples here). A few more:

  • Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, whose computer model predicting up to 2 million American dead from Covid was used to justify emergency declarations in the US is now confirmed as a criminal lie, with that “official expert” caught having an extramarital affair in multiple violations of his own recommendation of healthy persons’ “quarantine.” Ferguson’s history includes predicting up to 200 million dead from Avian Flu in 2005 (low hundreds died), in 2009 predicting 65,000 dead in the UK (he was off by 64,500+), and in 2001 his false projections of Mad Cow Disease culled ~14,000,000 healthy animals (all here). Almost all Americans are unaware that this incompetent model from a proven incompetent was used to justify the worst economic attack on Americans in our nation’s history, as well as locking-out our schools. 
  • 5-minute video of Hawaii Lt. Governor Dr. Josh Green’s hypocrisy to require indoor masks for all, but when he hosts an August 24, 2021 political fundraiser for his aspirations for Governor, all donors are maskless while “hired help” wear masks (cost to attend: $1,000 to $6,000).
  • Investment Watch’s documentation of more lies you might want to see.
  • A Canadian pastor is facing 4 years in prison for “inciting church” while Canadian PM Trudeau and G7 heads of state party and chat without masks in June 2021 (more photos here). California taxes were used to pay $800,000 in lawsuit compensation to a Los Angeles church that government attempted to close.
  • The 1918 mask “mandates” were ended shortly after a photograph of a San Francisco boxing match showed the mayor with a leading health policy administrator, and a Member of Congress as maskless.


Our leaders at the June 2021 G7 (more photos here):


(Blogger uncooperative; see multiple photos at links)


You may already know that global protests are growing against prima facie-illegal “health” “orders.” Some examples of public protests growing to hundreds of thousands of people up to millions (here, here for just two). Here’s an informative letter from 133 UK doctors and other health professionals explaining many points of the counterarguments against government lockdown policies. Based on such arguments and ~20,000 European deaths reported as “vaccine effects,” Denmark has removed all Covid restrictions. Sweden never shut-down or masked, and now reports few to zero deaths from Covid. 


Lancet’s online medical journal:


“Government actions such as border closures, full lockdowns, and a high rate of Covid-19 testing were not associated with statistically significant reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality.”


DHS National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin equates challenging Covid policies to domestic terrorism


DHS reports that those of us who challenge current and/or anticipated “government restrictions” “relating the the increasing COVID cases” (or to challenge what happened on 9/11 or the 2020 election) are engaged in “the broader sharing of false narratives and conspiracy theories” associated with “Violent Domestic Extremists” (DVEs) that “could serve as a catalyst for acts of targeted violence” through “online forums to influence and spread violent extremist narratives” (and here). 


Is this PLC communication to inform teachers of Big Picture data points they didn’t know in order to inform their voices and choices an example of “domestic terrorism”? If so, I’m fully prepared for that legal challenge with more important data you didn’t know, and probably should.


CDC releases plans of ‘isolation camps’ for the healthy to ‘shield’ the vaccinated, while Australia is building them???


As you may know, there are hundreds if not thousands of current lawsuits asking identical and similar questions as you read here. But there are further concerns you should know to empower your choices:

  • The CDC published a document titled: Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings, which explains CDC plans for “Covid-19”-declared house arrests, neighborhood lockdowns, evictions and/or relocations, and internment in concentration camps. This is literally what the plan documents. CDC promotes the plan on their website. I recommend this analysis of these documented and planned concentration camps for healthy Americans dictatorially-declared “at risk to their own and public health and safety.”
  • Dr. Fauci, political leaders, and corporate media are rolling-out rhetoric that the unvaccinated are a danger to the vaccinated, consistent with the above CDC planning to “shield” the injected from those refusing to be “patients of the state.”
  • Again, claims of “pandemic among the unvaccinated” are false because the CDC reduced the number of PCR cycles to “test” the vaccinated (≤ 28 cycles) while using 37+ cycles for the unvaccinated. Dr. Fauci and the WHO admit that 35+ cycles obviously produce false-positive results, consistent with PCR inventor Dr. Mullis’ quote above.
  • The Federation of State Medical Boards now threaten doctors with losing their medical license  (and here) if they challenge official “consensus” pushed by CDC and WHO, perhaps by sharing the kind of data you’re reading here, or the data presented by Dr. Dan Stock to the Mt. Vernon School Board in these 6 minutes.
  • Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education from 2009 to 2016, apparently supports DHS conflating American DVE (Domestic Violent Extremists) terrorists and those challenging injections and masks: “Have you noticed how strikingly similar both the mindsets and actions between the suicide bombers at Kabul’s airport, and the anti-mask and anti-vax people here?” 
  • Former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger told Americans who challenge CDC guidelines: “Screw your freedom.” We teach all public school students that political Oath of Office is the same as ours to support and defend Constitutional Rights, and never to screw them. 
  • Political and media “leaderships” argue strongly for vaccination, including creating separate classes of people based on “vaccination status” and percentage targets, while lying in omission so Americans are unaware of the data you read here.
  • The Australian government in Queensland is building their first CDC-style "quarantine" camp, complete with 47-second advertisement to “keep you safe” and government proclamations how “good” it is to be “safe.” Australian governments among its 6 states have also made “laws” that those ordered quarantined must download an app that government will signal randomly that requires the individual to respond with facial recognition software to verify their location within 15 minutes or face police response, uses military to stop protests (all protests are illegal), requires masks outdoors even when alone, and are allowed to leave home just once a day for essential shopping and without “window shopping.” The national law Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2020 allows government to hack any individual’s phone or computer to delete or alter your communications while posing to be that individual. Australian “truckies” are responding in protest by blocking highways; including their refusal of mandatory injections to work.


Why do corporate media report none of these data?


I have one published academic paper that includes a section that corporate media “reported” lies known to be false as they were told to promote the prima facie-illegal War on Terror (via the Claremont Colleges in 2015). If you want more detail on that subject, I wrote a 2005 ~40-page White Paper leveraged by Congressmember Kucinich for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney for illegal Wars of Aggression (documenting those illegal wars is another section of my published paper).


I have direct experience of corporate media lying on the facts to end global poverty since 1981 at the cost of ~1,000,000 children dying in slow-motion agony every month. The total human deaths from preventable poverty just since the Clinton Administration is ~400 million, which is more than the total deaths of all wars and violence of any kind in all recorded human history. I report from 18 years’ work where I briefed Members of Congress on ~300 policy proposals that led to two UN Summits for heads of State. If you want a stunning and game-changing example of corporate media lying, scroll down to this 1990 New York Times disinformation “coverage” buried in the back of the paper about the largest meeting of heads of state in world history. 


There is even compelling evidence that “crisis actors” are being used to promote fear and prima facie-illegal lockdowns.


There is nothing to believe or disbelieve in this entire PLC communication; the facts are objective and independently verifiable.


Ok, again: what does any of this have to do with teaching and learning at HHS???


Again: HHS Solutions and Beyond! PLC considers broad policies that directly impact HHS teaching and learning. Current HUSD policies to uphold county and state “health” “orders” are illegal on their face because the foundational Constitutional laws refute masks and physical separations (and more), and Governor Newsom’s cited California Government Code 8558 (b) has the reasonable limit of “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency orders. 


Because all Californians were lied to in omission to never receive comprehensive and independently-verifiable hospital data, and lied to in commission to substitute claimed and problematic “positive cases” as an illegal substitute for “beyond control” hospitals, AND that these policies directly impacted HHS teaching and learning by doubling our student failure rates, we teachers have every reason and right to demand an explanation how these polices are within limited government OR for HUSD to downgrade “orders” to “advice.” 


In fact, our mutual Oath requires we either receive reasonable explanation and citation of ordering authority from primary documents, or we must take actions to honor our Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the US and California. HUSD and the 14 most authoritative CA government agencies’ current explanation to “just follow orders” is illegal on its face, and an insult to all our ancestors’ work and sacrifices for limited government upholding inalienable Natural Rights, and an attack on all our children’s education of equal treatment under Constitutional laws.


If you’ve made it all the way through, thank you for your attention :)


And again, if you’d like to receive further information, have questions or arguments, or to join my voice in this reasonable request for an explanation of legality to orders under threats of termination of employment, $1,000 fines, and being locked in prison for a year (or CDC camp), please let me know.


Just another Farmer nurturing roots of public education under American limited government,

Carl


**


Up next: I’ll report on lawyer(s) analysis for my case, and on outcomes of emailing my teaching colleagues at a NorCal public high school. Within 3 hours of sending our PLC report to ~100 teachers, my school principal responded in shall I say less than full support. I will discuss all district responses with my attorneys to inform my next update :)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘Financial’/‘monetary’/‘derivative’ house-of-cards collapse? Remember: Superior mechanics already proven by Ben Franklin with monetary reform and public banking, backed by Thomas Edison, 86% of Economics professors

Image
In 2002, mega-investor  Warren Buffett wrote  that derivatives were “financial weapons of mass destruction.” At that time, their total “notional” value (the value of the underlying assets from which the “derivatives” were “derived”) was  estimated at $56 trillion .  Investopedia reported in May 2022  that the derivatives bubble had reached an estimated $600 trillion according to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), and that the total is often estimated at over $1 quadrillion.  No one knows for sure, because  most of the trades are done privately .    ~ Ellen Brown, The Looming Quadrillion Dollar Derivatives Tsunami , 3/12/23 I’m inspired by my friend and colleague Ellen’s article, along with this excellent discussion among leading economic rebels, to comment that any “paper collapse” of gambling/fraud is good , and solutions are ready to implement now . What the derivative bubble Ellen explains and documents means relative to the Fed promising today to fully fund all Silicon
Read more

Essay to ~100 teacher colleagues for “red-pill scholarship” to explain, document, & prove Evil totalitarian global scamdemic

In my ongoing challenge to my NorCal public school district to force them to either explain how their “health” “orders” are within legal limits (the district refuses; only dictating “just follow orders”), OR to downgrade “orders” to “advice,” I sent the following email to ~100 teaching colleagues on September 4.   The title’s promise is that I will explain, document, and prove an evil totalitarian global “scamdemic.” As a professional scholar, I chose each word for precision and concision. I challenge you, the reader, to invent a more accurate title after you’ve carefully read for any factual errors, both in commission and omission. And should you find the factual claims are substantiated, then please have a chat with yourself about withdrawing your consent from associated “Covid” “leaders.” This ~4,700 word essay is my best “shot” to “red-pill” colleagues with a documented paper that explains and proves the Covid-19 policies are both prima facie- illegal and based on provable game-c
Read more

Ready for another game-changer? Tartaria was a global civilization with free energy, healing centers, classic architecture that our Evil .01% ‘reset’ ~200 years ago then claimed as their own (mud floods, World’s Fairs, star forts, and more)

Image
As a professional historian with published research , I’m one of hundreds in independent media who explain, document, and prove the United States is an ongoing criminal rogue state empire . The abundant lies of omission and commission to propagandize empire start in corporate media , then are placed in school text books . The annual costs of the .01% psychopath class include millions killed , billions harmed, and trillions looted . If you believe anything claimed by proven Orwellian-liars acting as “official” empire “leaders,” you are a sheeple. Sheeple ignore the objective and independently verifiable data of the first paragraph to believe the US-led wars are for peace , exponential debt means prosperity, we had a fair election in 2020 , our leaders care about children , and forcing people to wear masks and never get close to other humans while forbidding “non-essentials” to work is  for our safety . Reflection upon the above documented data that expose the US as the leading cri
Read more