Odds that Nithya Raman ‘won’ 51% of L.A. Mayor ‘mail-in’ ‘ballots’: 1 in 10^97,500 = it’s more likely you’d win 11,000 consecutive Powerball lottery jackpots = most outrageous ‘official’ ELECTION FRAUD in history?

The public is dictated from “election” “officials” that in the June 2, 2026 Los Angeles Mayor primary election, Nithya Raman received ~9,000 of the first ~120,000 “mail-in” “votes” over June 3-4 (~7.5%), then over June 4-5 got ~82,000 of the next ~158,000 “votes” (~51%) (see chart @ 2:00). 


Duck.ai reports the odds that Raman received such a “vote spike” from 7.5% to 51% as 1 in 10^(97,500); a number with ~97,000 zeroes.


Because we never work with such numbers, some comparisons:

  • The odds of winning the Powerball jackpot is ~175,000,000 to 1. The odds of winning two consecutive Powerball jackpots is 30,625,000,000,000,000 to 1 (175 million times itself). It’s more likely you’d win over 11,000 consecutive Powerball jackpots than the Raman vote spike being true.
  • Earth is about 4.5 billion years old in another “official” “his-story,” which is 1.64 trillion days. If we had a computer randomly select one of those days, the odds of you picking that same day is 1.64 trillion to 1. You are more likely to accomplish this miracle than it’s probable Raman’s spike is accurate.
  • In fact, the number of seconds Earth has existed is 141.7 quadrillion. You’re more likely to correctly predict which random second of Earth’s existence a computer selects than the “official” election count not being a lie.
  • Of course, we can also say you’re personally more likely to select a random one millionth of a second from all Earth’s existence over 4.5 billion years than Raman’s spike not being a hoax.

Moreover, We the People are also dictated Karen Bass received ~67,000 of the first ~120,000 “mail-in” “votes” over June 3-4 (~56%), then over June 4-5 got ~31,000 of the next ~158,000 “votes” (~20%). Duck.ai reports those odds as 10^(−~9189): which means it’s more likely you’d win over 1,000 consecutive Powerball jackpots than for Bass’ “votes” to drop from 56% to 20%. The prima facie conclusion: “official” cheating shifted fake votes from Bass to Raman.


The same argument exists for “Biden” “winning” in 2020: all five “swing states” had Trump winning until “emergencies” stopped “counting”, then resumed with IMPOSSIBLE “vote” “counts,” including this 85 seconds of Pennsylvania State Legislature documentation of an “official” “vote” “batch” of ~600,000 votes for Biden with only ~3,000 for Trump:




Spiked “votes” for Biden in the ratio of ~200 to 1 are mathematically impossible. That such a spike would occur randomly in a condition of ~50% votes going to Biden and ~50% to Trump is similar to a coin-flip: one flip is calculated by 2 options to the first power. That two votes would both be for Biden produce odds of 2 to the 2nd power: one in four or 25%. Three consecutive votes to Biden is 2 to the 3rd power or one in eight (12.5%). But a ratio of alleged “random” ballots in a ratio of ~200 to 1 for Biden is similar to 200 coin tosses going all to one side before the other occurs. 


This produces odds of a number with 50 to 60 zeroes behind it (x/base = 2, n/exponent = 200): 


1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000  to  1.


These odds mean it’s more likely you’d win three consecutive Powerball jackpots than Biden receiving a 200:1 vote ratio.


As I’ve documented for over a decade: “When Americans are told an election is defined by touching a computer screen without a countable receipt that can be verified, they are being told a criminal lie to allow election fraud. This is self-evident, but PrincetonStanford, and the President of the American Statistical Association are among the leaders pointing to the obvious (and herehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehereherehere). Again, no professional would/can argue an election is legitimate when there is nothing for anyone to count. The facts show Bernie Sanders won the 2016 Democratic Primary election, and claims by Democratic “leadership” of Russian election “meddling” are without factual documentation.”  


And then there’s the “money”; more corrupt than “elections”:


If Los Angeles, California, the US, and Earth are to progress beyond human servitude to psychopathic public serpent puppeticians looting and lying to WW3 while “health” “ordering” us shot at their will and literally ~1,000,000 of our Brothers and Sisters die in horrific slow motion from preventable poverty each month, then We the People must rise with our thoughts words and actions.


One area to ascend is with our public money, obviously. 


Public banking and monetary reform are worth ~$1,000,000 per average US household, and nearly instantly transform our economic landscape from desperation to abundance. 


See my published research via The Claremont Colleges for yourself:


‘Financial’/‘monetary’/‘derivative’ house-of-cards paper-collapse? Superior mechanics READY NOW proven by Ben Franklin, backed by 86% of Economics professors: monetary reform + public banking


**

I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here) with published research. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.


**

Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu 


Note: My work from 2011 to October 2017 is on Washington’s Blog, which the owner closed from Internet censorship in 2019, and here since, with 1,000+ public essays and 300+ video interviews to 50+million views. Work back to 2009 is censored by Examiner.com (blocked author pages: herehere). This means that some links in essays are inactive. If you’d like to see those articles, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the search box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The one article you need to prove current US wars are lie-started Wars of Aggression not even close to lawful self-defense, war-murder millions, loot trillions, and require YOUR voice for .01% arrests

‘Financial’/‘monetary’/‘derivative’ house-of-cards paper-collapse? Superior mechanics READY NOW proven by Ben Franklin, backed by 86% of Economics professors: monetary reform + public banking

Open letter to school boards, teachers’ unions, families: Funding crisis for all public goods & services already solved by Ben Franklin with monetary reform and public banking, backed by Thomas Edison, 86% of Economics professors